Beschreibung:
The book's authors agree to publish in Macedonian, English and Chinese language versions. The central thesis in the research efforts divided into two chapters is whether the EU and China could be strategic partners and create a constructive world order. The first chapter is titled "e;Historical overview of strategic partnership."e; The authors state that the history of relations between the European Union and China represents an endless source of diverse analytic approaches and possibilities of creating appropriate evaluations and projections based on historical and actual happenings that concern both analysed subjects. Various literature depending on the authors' sources and affiliation, points out different approaches to analysing the historical retrospective of the relations between the European Union and China. These references cover various scientific fields from politics, geopolitics, and geostrategy to possibly the essential economic premises of their continuous cooperation process. The second chapter is titled "e;Strategic partnership through the lens of Geopolitics and Geoeconomics."e; Many scholars have researched the EU-China relation through the prism of international relations theories. Indeed, their works are based on realism, economic liberalism, and constructivist approaches, offering some visions for the next steps in that complicated relationship. This chapter aims to use the geopolitical and geoeconomic research methodology. The geopolitical, mainly critical geopolitical reasoning and geoeconomic influence from China, embodied by the Belt and Road Initiatives and cooperation mechanisms "e;17+1"e;, now "e;16+1,"e; are being examined after Lithuania quit initiative participation in 2021. This chapter analyses the initiative as "e;17 + 1."e; Both subjects of the analytical framework have had geopolitical and geoeconomic influences. In this chapter, the central thesis examines whether the two analysed issues contribute to the EU's geopolitical transformation and strengthening of the EU's unity or disunity?. a a Za c Ya Za a a c cs a sa c c a a e i a a a Zc a a e a aS "e;a e a "e;a e a se a a a 2016 a 11 28 i c a c Za Z c c a aSzcs "e; c a a a c i sa e a c c a "e;a a a cs a a a aSzi a a a a 40 a a a c a a i a a a c cs a a a a ze a a Z a i a e a Z a a --a a c c a - a e a a c a c S a a a c i cZ a a e a a e c 5 c a a a sa a a c a sc a c a e a a e a c Z --cs a aS a , a e a e a e e a e cs a e Ya Sa Sa a e a e a e a a Sa e a a c c a e a a cs e e i e a e Sa c a a a a cs a a aY eZ a a e e c a a a a Za e c c a cs c c e e a a a c a a a a a a a e a c a s a a a a a a i a a z a c Ye a a a a a a a c e a cs a a a a i Y a i a e a z a a e aS a sa cs a a i a zc a e a e e i sa a a a a e e i Ya c Ya a a e a a c a a a a c e a a c c a a e c i c c a a a a c eS a c a c e a "e; c a a a c cs aZ a a "e;a a e a i c Ya a a a e cs aZ a a c a e a a c a z a a e i a a a Sa a a z a e cs aZ a a c Ya za a a a e a cs e a a e a a e cs a es a z a c i a c c a a a z c Ya Za a a c cs aZ a a ze cs a a a e a a e c c a a a cs c a e aYYi a Z a a c a a c c a a a a e c a a cs aY c Za a c cs c c aY a Za e a a a e cs a c c i a a e e cs a a e c e a a S c Ya a a cs a c c e e cs a a i a c a a a a e a a z a a cs e a a c e a cs z a a e e e a z i eZ a cs c z a e a a cs c a aS aS a c a c cs e "e;a c a a c c Za e e a cs c a a a c "e;a e a sa e a Za e a c c e cs e a c c a a a c a a a za Si a a cs c c aY a ZcZ a za a a c Ze c a a a a z a a c e i a e c a a c cs a a c c a a a a a c a a c a c a a c c Zc c i a c e a a Z 2021 a a e a a e a Zi a e a "e;a a a e "e;a e a c eZ aY e a a e a c Z a a e a a "e;17+1"e;a a a i cZ a cs "e;16+1"e;i a a e cs a c i a e a e cs a c Z c a a c c Za a a a c a i a e e a z a "e;17+1"e; a a z z cs a a a e e a a c a a c c Za a a a c a i a a e c a a Ze Y e a a a z cs a e a aS a Z c Ycs a c e az a aS a c Ycs c Ya a c Ya a a a e a e a Zc e cZ a a c a a c a cs a c cS a a a a aS a a z c c Ya a a e a a e a cs a c c a a c a a a c a e i a c Ya a a s e a cs e i a a a e a "e;c c Y c za a "e;a e a cs a e a a e a e a e a a c a c a e a a c a Z"e; a aY e a e e a a "e;i a e c e c a e c "e;a c a Za a "e;i a a Sa sa e c "e;a a a a cs a c e "e;a "e;a c cs a c "e;a a i a Ye a a a a a cs e e a
The book’s authors agree to publish in Macedonian, English and Chinese language versions. The central thesis in the research efforts divided into two chapters is whether the EU and China could be strategic partners and create a constructive world order. The first chapter is titled “Historical overview of strategic partnership.” The authors state that the history of relations between the European Union and China represents an endless source of diverse analytic approaches and possibilities of creating appropriate evaluations and projections based on historical and actual happenings that concern both analysed subjects. Various literature depending on the authors’ sources and affiliation, points out different approaches to analysing the historical retrospective of the relations between the European Union and China. These references cover various scientific fields from politics, geopolitics, and geostrategy to possibly the essential economic premises of their continuous cooperation process. The second chapter is titled “Strategic partnership through the lens of Geopolitics and Geoeconomics.” Many scholars have researched the EU-China relation through the prism of international relations theories. Indeed, their works are based on realism, economic liberalism, and constructivist approaches, offering some visions for the next steps in that complicated relationship. This chapter aims to use the geopolitical and geoeconomic research methodology. The geopolitical, mainly critical geopolitical reasoning and geoeconomic influence from China, embodied by the Belt and Road Initiatives and cooperation mechanisms “17+1”, now “16+1,” are being examined after Lithuania quit initiative participation in 2021. This chapter analyses the initiative as “17 + 1.” Both subjects of the analytical framework have had geopolitical and geoeconomic influences. In this chapter, the central thesis examines whether the two analysed issues contribute to the EU’s geopolitical transformation and strengthening of the EU’s unity or disunity?.
本书源于对欧盟与中国关系的多年研究和兴趣，事件从第一作者参 加“中欧论坛”国际会议开始。2016 年 11 月 28 日，由中欧经济与 政治研究所主办的“战略伙伴关系：建设性世界秩序”在捷克布拉格的 欧洲之家举办，时值中欧建交 40 周年。由此开始，对中欧关系的关注 度数倍增长。与此同时，在来自于我同事--德国科特布斯-森夫滕贝格勃 兰登堡科技大学公法系，环境和规划法学院 第5教研室商业、法律和社 会科学教研室 艾克·阿尔布雷希特教授--的帮助下, 我在马其顿国防部 发行的国际期刊《当代马其顿国防》上发表了两篇文章。针对本书的需 要，来自希腊伯罗奔尼撒大学的同事 埃莱尼·克里托普卢还贡献了几个 与中欧项目相关的研究问题。她有伯罗奔尼撒大学政治学和国际关系博 士学位。另外，她分析了欧盟能否在未来几年保持在全球贸易中的主导 地位？此外，她还分析了国际权力博弈的变化，回答了这个问题：中国 为什么重要？
以欧盟和中国能否成为战略伙伴并建立良好世界秩序为重点，本研究 分为两个章节。第一章标题为“战略伙伴关系的历史概况”。作者指出，欧盟和中国 之间的历史关系代表了各种分析方法和可能性，可以根据涉及两个分析 主题的历史和真实事件创建适当的评估和预测。根据作者的来源和隶属 关系，各种文献指出了分析欧盟与中国关系的历史回顾的不同方法。这 些参考文献涵盖了不同的科学领域，从政治、地缘政治和地缘战略到它 们可能持续合作的基本经济前提。本章的研究是基于作者最初可以收集的所有可用文献，可以访问的开 放互联网资源以及欧盟和中国的官方网站进行的。因此，使用了官方媒 体门户和分析中心的资料。使用适当的方法框架对全部材料进行分析，此时获得的结果代表了最初的科学努力。第二章的标题是“地缘政治和地缘经济学视角下的战略伙伴关系”。
许多学者从国际关系理论的角度研究了中欧关系。事实上，他们的研究 基于现实主义、经济自由主义和建构主义理论，为这种复杂关系的下 一步研究提供了一些愿景。本章旨在使用地缘政治和地缘经济研究方 法，在立陶宛于 2021 年提出退出倡议后，审视以“一带一路”倡议 托尼 米莱斯基·艾克 阿尔布雷希特·埃莱尼 克里托普卢 和“17+1”合作机制（现在的“16+1”）为代表的地缘政治，主要是关 键的地缘政治推理和地缘经济影响。在本章中，倡议被分析为“17+1” 。分析框架的两个主题都具有地缘政治和地缘经济影响。在本章中，中 心论点在于考查这两个分析的主题是否有助于欧盟的地缘政治转型和加
强欧盟的统一或不统一。本书主要侧重于理解现代全球化世界时代的关系状态。其内容力图回 答欧盟和中国能否为良好的世界秩序建立合作关系。或者，正如欧盟委 员会最近指出的那样，它们可能成为“系统性竞争对手”。该书的作者同意以马其顿文、英文和中文版本出版。这本书将用于“ 圣基里尔麦托迪大学”，主要用来攻读硕士课程“地缘政治与安全”，以及博士课程“国家安全的地缘政治方面”和“冲突的地缘政治”。同 时，也面向国内外更广泛的读者。
