Aspects of Good and Evil in "Harry Potter - The Prisoner of Azkaban"

Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: good minus, University of Münster (English Seminar), language: English, abstract: In novels and fictional stories we often meet good and evil characterscharacters which fight each other. This fight between good and evil makes thestory ...

Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: good minus, University of Münster (English Seminar), language: English, abstract: In novels and fictional stories we often meet good and evil characterscharacters which fight each other. This fight between good and evil makes thestory really interesting and exciting because it hurries the action along. But oftenthe reader is not able to say which character really belongs to the good or the evilones. It is the ambiguity of the characters and their changes during the story thatgrip the readers. This paper will have a look at one exemplary character and try tosolve the question whether it is good or evil. Besides, the thesis that animals andcreatures in The Prisoner of Azkaban cannot be categorized as clearly as the maincharacters will be dealt with. In this way different aspects of the terms "good" and"evil" shall be demonstrated. "Good" and "evil" represent a pair of opposites that is part of many stories andof our whole life. Actions which are against virtues and values, which arereprehensible and damnable, are generally seen as evil. Pleasure in destroying, inlying, in betraying and in being cruel, in neglecting the rights of human beingsthese aspects are declared to be evil.1 They belong to actions and theirconsequences which are caused by human beings, for example torturing innocentpeople in a war. Due to St. Augustine, these are moral evils or deficiencies ofman's will. He thinks of the moral evil as the true evil because human beings havefree will and the choice to do good or evil. So it is their choice to commit evilactions or not.2 [...]1 See Rudolf Eisler, ed. Wörterbuch der philosophischen Begriffe 1, 4th ed. (Berlin: Mittler undSohn, 1927), p. 227.2 See Ester S. Buchholz and Joshua K. Mandel, "Reaching for Virtue, Stumbling on Sin: Conceptsof Good and Evil in a Postmodern Era.", Journal of Religion and Health 39.2, (2000): p. 130.