Beschreibung:
In this annual review from the Cato Institute, leading legal scholars analyze the 2019-2020 Supreme Court term, specifically the most important and far-reaching cases of the year, plus cases coming up. Now in its nineteenth edition, the Review is the first scholarly journal to appear after the term's end and the only one grounded in the nation's first principles, liberty, and limited government.
Now in its 19th year, the Cato Supreme Court Review brings together leading legal scholars to analyze key cases from the Court's most recent term, plus cases coming up. Topics in the 2019-2020 edition include DACA and the Dreamers (DHS v. Regents), the president's removal power (Seila Law v. CFPB), Obamacare's so-called contraception mandate (Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania), qualified and absolute immunity (Hernandez v. Mesa), and using state tuition assistance on religious schools (Espinoza v. Montana).