SCOTUS and COVID

SCOTUS and COVID
-0 %
Der Artikel wird am Ende des Bestellprozesses zum Download zur Verfügung gestellt.
How the Media Reacted to the Livestreaming of Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Sofort lieferbar | Lieferzeit: Sofort lieferbar

Unser bisheriger Preis:ORGPRICE: 37,44 €

Jetzt 37,43 €*

Artikel-Nr:
9781538172636
Veröffentl:
2023
Seiten:
152
Autor:
Rachael Houston
eBook Typ:
EPUB
Kopierschutz:
Adobe DRM [Hard-DRM]
Sprache:
Englisch
Beschreibung:

In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the U.S. Supreme Court livestreamed their oral arguments for the first time, an unprecedented shift that allowed access to proceedings in real time to the news media and public, alike.

This book compares the volume and nature of online print and broadcast television coverage from major media outlets from all U.S. Supreme Court oral argument sessions during the October 2019, 2020, and 2021 Terms. The authors demonstrate that the move to livestreaming the Court’s oral argument sessions increased the frequency and depth of online print news media’s coverage in the short term but not in the long term. For both online print and broadcast outlets, their findings suggest that the benefits of increased transparency offered by livestreaming oral argument audio did not come with significant disadvantages for the Court in terms of long-term changes in its news media coverage.

The authors analysis provides timely evidence that speaks to the current, and ongoing, debate about public access to the Supreme Court. It also speaks to the likely consequences of permanently continuing the practice of livestreaming oral argument audio and sheds light on the ramifications of other potential expansions in transparency at the Supreme Court, such as livestreaming opinion announcement audio or providing live video coverage of the Court’s proceedings. This work speaks to the impact of increased access to oral arguments and the inner workings of government institutions more broadly. Indeed, the U.S. Supreme Court was not the only institution to grapple with the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic and opportunities for unprecedented, and instantaneous, access to anyone, anywhere. Better understanding the implications of the Court’s decision to livestream audio from its proceedings provides leverage on the consequences of greater government transparency for news media coverage and, by extension, individuals’ exposure to, and interaction with, government more generally.

List of Figures

List of Tables

Acknowledgements

Introduction: The Supreme Court, Media Coverage and Oral Arguments

Chapter 1: Examining News Media Coverage of Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Chapter 2: Did Livestreamed Arguments Increase Online Print Media Coverage of the Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Chapter 3: Did Livestreamed Arguments Change How Online Print Media Covered the Court?

Chapter 4: Did Livestreamed Arguments Change the Volume and Content of Broadcast Media Coverage?

Discussion and Conclusion

Appendix

Bibliography

About the Authors

Kunden Rezensionen

Zu diesem Artikel ist noch keine Rezension vorhanden.
Helfen sie anderen Besuchern und verfassen Sie selbst eine Rezension.