Supremely Partisan

Supremely Partisan
How Raw Politics Tips the Scales in the United States Supreme Court
 HC gerader Rücken mit Schutzumschlag
Print on Demand | Lieferzeit: Print on Demand - Lieferbar innerhalb von 3-5 Werktagen I

28,20 €* HC gerader Rücken mit Schutzumschlag

Alle Preise inkl. MwSt. | zzgl. Versand
Artikel-Nr:
9781442266360
Veröffentl:
2016
Einband:
HC gerader Rücken mit Schutzumschlag
Erscheinungsdatum:
01.09.2016
Seiten:
312
Autor:
James D. Zirin
Gewicht:
676 g
Format:
235x157x23 mm
Sprache:
Englisch
Beschreibung:

James D. Zirin is a leading litigator in federal and state courts around the nation, the host of the critically acclaimed television talk show, "Conversations in the Digital Age," and is the author of the best-selling book, published in 2014, The Mother Court-Tales of Cases That Mattered in America's Greatest Trial Court. A graduate of Princeton University with honors, he served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the office of Robert M. Morgenthau, and has written hundreds of op-ed articles on subjects ranging from law to foreign relations.
On the eve of a presidential election that may determine the makeup of Supreme Court justices for decades to come, prominent attorney James D. Zirin argues that the Court has become increasingly partisan, rapidly making policy choices right and left on bases that have nothing to do with law or the Constitution. Zirin explains how we arrived at the present situation and looks at the current divide through its leading partisans, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor on the left and Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas on the right. He also examines four of the Court's most controversial recent decisions - Hobby Lobby, Obamacare, gay marriage, and capital punishment - arguing that these politicized decisions threaten to undermine public confidence in the Supreme Court.
ForewordIntroduction1 What the Supreme Court Is Supposed (and Not Supposed)to Do2 Identity Politics and the Partisan Court3 Religion and the Partisan Court4 Two of the Eighty-Nine WASP Male Justices: Marshall andHolmesJohn Marshall-Elaborating the Rule of LawOliver Wendell Holmes-Elaborating the Rules for FreeSpeechCampaign Finance and Deregulation-Speech Unknownto Marshall and Holmes5 The Catholic Seat6 The Jewish Seat: Tradition, Tradition!7 And Goldberg Begat Fortas: End of the Jewish Seat8 The Supreme Court Tackles the Middle East: Is JerusalemPart of Israel?9 The Female Seat and Ruth Bader Ginsburg10 The Black Seat: Finding The "Best Qualified"Thomas and Natural LawThomas and the Voting Rights ActThomas and Affirmative Action11 Antonin Scalia (1936-2016): "More Catholic Than the Pope"12 Sonia Sotomayor: The Wise Latina Woman and IdentityPolitics13 Hobby Lobby: Religious Freedom v. Reproductive Rights14 The Obamacare Cases: The Chief Rides to the Rescue15 Gay Marriage: "The Times They Are A-Changin'"16 Capital Punishment: Death Is DifferentConclusionAcknowledgmentsIndexAbout the Author

Kunden Rezensionen

Zu diesem Artikel ist noch keine Rezension vorhanden.
Helfen sie anderen Besuchern und verfassen Sie selbst eine Rezension.