Bücher online kaufen
Epistemic Justification
Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues
Nicht lieferbar | Lieferzeit: Nicht lieferbar I
62,60 €*
Alle Preise inkl. MwSt. | Versandkostenfrei
Artikel-Nr:
9780631182849
Seiten:
250
Autor:
Ernest Sosa
Gewicht:
368 g
Format:
228x182x34 mm
Serie:
Great Debates in Philosophy
Sprache:
Englisch
Beschreibung:
Laurence BonJour is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Washington, where he teaches epistemology, history of modern philosophy, metaphysics, philosophy of law, and political philosophy. He is the author of three books: The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (1985), In Defense of Pure Reason (1998), and Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses (2002).
Ernest Sosa is Professor of Philosophy at Brown University and Distinguished Visiting Professor at Rutgers University every spring term. He has written widely on epistemology and is author of Knowledge in Perspective (1991). Sosa and His Critics, edited by John Greco, is forthcoming in the Blackwell series, Philosophers and Their Critics.
Ernest Sosa is Professor of Philosophy at Brown University and Distinguished Visiting Professor at Rutgers University every spring term. He has written widely on epistemology and is author of Knowledge in Perspective (1991). Sosa and His Critics, edited by John Greco, is forthcoming in the Blackwell series, Philosophers and Their Critics.
Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one s belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge.
Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate.
Introduces students to fundamental questions within epistemology while engaging in contemporary debates.
Written by two of today's foremost epistemologists.
Includes an extensive bibliography.
Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate.
Introduces students to fundamental questions within epistemology while engaging in contemporary debates.
Written by two of today's foremost epistemologists.
Includes an extensive bibliography.
Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one s belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge.
Introduction. Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa.
Part I: A Version of Internalist Foundationalism: Laurence BonJour:.
1. The Regress Problem and Foundationalism.
2. Externalist Accounts of Justification.
3. In Search of Coherentism.
4. Back to Foundationalism.
5. The Conceptualization of Sensory Experience and the Problem of the External World.
Part II: Beyond Internal Foundations to External Virtues: Ernest Sosa:.
6. Knowledge and Justification.
7. Does Knowledge Have Foundation.
8. Skepticism and the Internal/External Divide.
9. A Virtue Epistemology.
Part III: Replies:.
10. Reply to Sosa.
11. Reply to Bonjour.
Bibliography.
Index.
Part I: A Version of Internalist Foundationalism: Laurence BonJour:.
1. The Regress Problem and Foundationalism.
2. Externalist Accounts of Justification.
3. In Search of Coherentism.
4. Back to Foundationalism.
5. The Conceptualization of Sensory Experience and the Problem of the External World.
Part II: Beyond Internal Foundations to External Virtues: Ernest Sosa:.
6. Knowledge and Justification.
7. Does Knowledge Have Foundation.
8. Skepticism and the Internal/External Divide.
9. A Virtue Epistemology.
Part III: Replies:.
10. Reply to Sosa.
11. Reply to Bonjour.
Bibliography.
Index.